Empirical stock–flow consistent models: evolution, current state and …

Empirical stock–flow consistent models: evolution, current state and …

The transition towards a sustainable, low-carbon economy is a pressing challenge facing Europe and the world. As policymakers and industry leaders seek to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, and pilot innovative technologies like hydrogen, the need for robust economic modeling frameworks has become increasingly evident. One such approach, the empirical stock-flow consistent (SFC) model, has gained traction in recent years for its ability to capture the intricate linkages between the real and financial sectors of the economy.

Theoretical Foundations

At the heart of SFC models lies the fundamental principle of stock-flow consistency. This concept emphasizes the interplay between stocks (e.g., assets, liabilities) and flows (e.g., income, expenditure) within an integrated accounting framework. ​Unlike traditional macroeconomic models, which often treat the financial and real domains as separate, SFC models recognize the inherent interdependence between these spheres, providing a more holistic representation of economic dynamics.

Key concepts underpinning SFC models include the balance sheet, which records the historical evolution of the economy’s financial positions, and the stock-to-flow feedback mechanism, which captures the lasting impact of past decisions on current and future outcomes. This path-dependent nature of SFC models sets them apart from equilibrium-based frameworks, allowing for the exploration of imbalances and unsustainable conditions.

Model Structures

SFC models can be broadly categorized into three types, each with its unique structure and scope. The New Cambridge type features an aggregated private sector, often combining households, firms, and banks. These models are well-suited for medium-term projections and identifying sectoral imbalances.

The Godley-Lavoie type, on the other hand, treats the main institutional sectors (e.g., households, firms, government, financial institutions) separately, resulting in a more detailed representation of the economy. These models are adept at assessing a wide range of fiscal, monetary, and financial policies.

The High Complexity models exhibit increasingly intricate structures, reflecting their ability to capture more nuanced transmission mechanisms and dynamics. While these models often provide deeper insights into specific research questions, they can also face challenges in accurately replicating financial sector outcomes.

Empirical Applications

Empirical SFC models are typically estimated econometrically, with the error correction mechanism serving as a common empirical form. This approach aligns with the underlying stock-flow dynamics, whereby deviations from long-term norms are gradually corrected. However, the performance of these models in replicating financial variables can vary, with some exhibiting better fit in the real sector compared to the financial domain.

Case studies from Europe illustrate the diversity of SFC modeling applications. The New Cambridge models for the UK, Greece, and Argentina have demonstrated strong real-side projections, while the Godley-Lavoie models for the UK, Italy, and Campania (Italy) have provided detailed insights into the interactions between institutional sectors.

The High Complexity models, such as those developed for the UK, Austria, France, the Netherlands, and Colombia, have tackled more specialized research questions, ranging from financialization dynamics to the macroeconomic implications of the green transition.

Evolutionary Trends

The field of empirical SFC modeling has witnessed a gradual yet steady evolution, driven by the need to address increasingly complex economic challenges. From the initial New Cambridge type to the more sophisticated Godley-Lavoie and High Complexity models, the structures have become more intricate, reflecting the growing recognition of the importance of financial-real linkages.

Technological advancements, such as improved data availability and computational power, have enabled the development of these advanced modeling frameworks. Furthermore, the integration of emerging methodologies, such as input-output analysis and agent-based modeling, has expanded the analytical capabilities of SFC models.

Current Research State

The current state of empirical SFC modeling is marked by ongoing efforts to refine and enhance the frameworks. While the models have demonstrated their effectiveness in capturing macro-financial dynamics, there is a continuous pursuit to address persistent challenges, such as accurately replicating financial sector outcomes and incorporating the role of the environment.

Researchers are exploring ways to improve the behavioral frameworks of SFC models, drawing insights from structuralist and Minskyan approaches. The integration of financial regulation requirements and sector-level financial fragility indicators are among the areas of active exploration.

Efforts are also underway to enhance the representation of the productive structure of the economy, acknowledging the need for a more nuanced understanding of interlinkages and productive capacities. Additionally, the modeling of the labor market is an area that requires further development, with researchers seeking to incorporate the impacts of labor market deregulation and institutional factors.

Modeling Challenges

Despite the advancements in empirical SFC modeling, several challenges remain. Data availability and quality continue to pose constraints, particularly in capturing the complexity of financial sector dynamics and the environmental dimensions of the economy.

Computational complexities also arise as the models become increasingly intricate, posing trade-offs between the level of detail and the goodness of fit. Researchers must navigate this balance, ensuring that the model structure aligns with the research question at hand while maintaining robust performance.

Interdisciplinary Perspectives

The evolving landscape of empirical SFC modeling intersects with various disciplines, highlighting the potential for cross-fertilization. The field of ecological economics, for instance, has started to integrate SFC principles into its analytical frameworks, exploring the macroeconomic implications of environmental transitions and the interplay between the economy and natural systems.

Similarly, the behavioral finance perspective has gained traction, informing the development of more nuanced financial sector behaviors within SFC models. By incorporating insights from these interdisciplinary fields, researchers can further enhance the relevance and applicability of empirical SFC models in addressing the pressing challenges facing Europe and the global economy.

As policymakers and industry leaders grapple with the complexities of the energy transition, the empirical SFC modeling approach offers a powerful tool for understanding the intricate linkages between the real and financial sectors, and for designing effective policies to support the shift towards a sustainable, low-carbon future. By continuously evolving and embracing interdisciplinary perspectives, these models can play a crucial role in shaping Europe’s energy landscape and driving the transition to a more resilient and environmentally-conscious economy.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn