Migration and asylum policies have become highly divisive topics across the European Union in recent years. Following the large increase in the number of refugees and other migrants applying for asylum in Europe in 2015-16, EU member states have engaged in heated debates about reforming the EU’s asylum and refugee policies.
Perceptions of Migrants
Public attitudes towards migrants and refugees vary considerably across Europe. Some view migrants as a threat to the economy, culture, and security, while others see migration as a net positive for society. Factors like age, education, and political ideology play a role in shaping these perceptions. Younger, more educated, and left-leaning individuals tend to hold more positive views towards migrants, while older, less educated, and right-wing voters are more likely to see migration as problematic.
Surveys show that public opposition to immigration remains high in many European countries, though attitudes have become more favorable in recent years. The percentage of people who think there are “too many immigrants” in their country has declined from over 80% in the 1970s to around 50% today. However, views on specific migrant groups, such as asylum seekers versus highly-skilled workers, can differ significantly.
Socioeconomic Factors
Socioeconomic status is a key determinant of attitudes towards migrants. Those who feel economically insecure or threatened by migrant labor are more likely to oppose immigration. Unemployment, slow wage growth, and perceptions of increased competition for jobs and social benefits can fuel anti-immigrant sentiment, particularly during economic downturns.
Cultural and identity-based concerns also shape views on migration. Individuals who feel their national or local culture is under threat from increasing diversity tend to be more hostile towards newcomers. Populist and nationalist movements have often capitalized on these fears, portraying migrants as a menace to traditional values and ways of life.
Cultural Considerations
Beyond the economic realm, the cultural and symbolic impact of migration is a major factor influencing public opinion. Migrants who are perceived as culturally distant – whether due to language, religion, or ethnicity – often face greater opposition than those seen as culturally similar. The rise of Islamophobia in parts of Europe is one prominent example of this dynamic.
Psychological factors like feelings of insecurity, loss of status, and perceived threats to one’s in-group also contribute to negative attitudes towards migrants. In times of crisis or uncertainty, such as the 2015 refugee influx or the COVID-19 pandemic, these dynamics can become particularly pronounced.
Preferences for Asylum Policies
As the EU and its member states have grappled with reforming asylum and refugee policies, public opinion has played a key role in shaping the political debate. Surveys reveal that European citizens often want to protect refugees, but prefer a policy approach that sets limits and conditions on migration.
Refugee Resettlement
On the issue of refugee resettlement, the European public exhibits a range of views. While some favor generous quotas for accepting refugees, others oppose any resettlement at all. Support for refugee resettlement tends to be higher among younger, more educated, and politically liberal individuals.
Border Control Measures
Regarding border control, Europeans generally express a desire for more restrictive policies. Many favor measures like strengthening external EU borders, imposing limits on the number of asylum applications accepted, and facilitating the return of failed asylum seekers to their countries of origin. At the same time, there is also support for mechanisms like humanitarian corridors and family reunification programs.
Humanitarian Concerns
Importantly, the research suggests that even individuals with low trust in European institutions can support policies that provide protection and assistance to refugees, as long as there are elements of control and conditionality. The public’s desire to balance humanitarian concerns with pragmatic policy tools is a key dynamic shaping asylum debates.
Refugee and Asylum-Seeker Policies
Policy Debates
The reform of asylum and refugee protection policies has been a major point of contention in European policy debates in recent years. Discussions have centered on questions of burden-sharing among member states, the criteria for granting asylum, the rights and obligations of refugees, and the handling of failed asylum claims.
International Cooperation
The European Union has sought to address these challenges through initiatives like the New Pact on Asylum and Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees. These frameworks aim to promote more coordinated and effective asylum policies across the bloc, as well as strengthen international cooperation on refugee issues.
Public Opinion Dynamics
Public opinion has been a crucial factor shaping the political feasibility of different policy proposals. Governments have had to balance humanitarian obligations with public concerns about immigration control and cultural integration. The interplay between public attitudes and policy choices continues to be a central dynamic in Europe’s evolving approach to asylum and refugee protection.
Implications for Europe
Integration Challenges
The integration of migrants and refugees remains a significant challenge for many European societies. Issues like language barriers, labor market access, and social inclusion can create tensions and resentment, fueling further anti-immigrant sentiment. Effective integration policies are key to fostering more positive public attitudes.
Political Discourse
The politicization of migration has had a profound impact on European politics. Immigration has become a wedge issue exploited by populist and nationalist parties, contributing to the polarization of the political landscape. Managing migration in a way that addresses public concerns while upholding humanitarian principles is a delicate balancing act for policymakers.
Policy Outcomes
Ultimately, the interaction between public opinion, political pressures, and policy choices will shape the future of asylum and refugee protection in Europe. As the continent grapples with these complex issues, finding the right mix of security, humanitarian, and integration measures will be crucial for promoting social cohesion and managing migration in a sustainable way.
The European Future Energy Forum provides a platform for policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society to discuss the continent’s transition to clean energy and tackle challenges like decarbonization, renewable energy expansion, and public-private partnerships. As the debate over asylum and refugee policies continues, insights from this forum could inform more holistic approaches to migration management that address both humanitarian and societal concerns.